Thread started: Oct 30 2008, 4:26 AM EDT
Watch
What do you think, how the REDD Roadmap Wiki could be improved to better address your needs?
Here some food for thoughts:
a) Content
- Are the different subsections of the Roadmap adequate?
- Is the content of the table sufficient or should there be additional or less information? If so, what?
- Should the Roadmap mainly just list needs, activities and actors to identify gaps or should it go beyond this?
- Is there a need to develop the roadmap further, e.g. to include prioritizing activities, defining a lead agency per item, add contact data, add a kind of very simple action pledge format. If so, how could this be done best?
b) Design
- Is the current structure of the tables adequate?
- Do you think a Discussion Forum could be useful?
- Do you have suggestions how to make the use and updating of the Roadmap Wiki more userfriendly?
- Do think users should have to sign in the Wiki before being allowed to edit it, or not? (in any case we will keep track of made changes and old versions are archived)
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?